![]() It's called "multiplexing" because audio and video data are interleaved. The cake is still the same cake, just the box is different. It's like taking a cake out of one box and putting it into another box. ![]() ![]() Re-multiplexing is the process of taking the compressed (or not) audio and video (and possibly other streams) out of one file and putting them into another (the container may be the same type or not) without decompressing and re-compressing them. Of course a (re-)muxing process natively, has nothing to do with re-encoding, de-interlacing, etc. So again, IMO it's about how you (want to) look at it. Or, if one tries to resolve an issue by muxing a sourcefile only with added/other muxing-settings, I would call that a remux too. Suppose you import a mkv into mkvtoolnix, drop a source-subtitle and add another one, mux to mkv again. In my view, the word remux would not only be used when "keeping original source streams and mux into another container". It's subject to consideration indeed, as ron spencer stated. Pre-playback, software de-interlacing for me forcibly comes into play when I need to slow-down certain sped-up (24fps based) PAL music material to native speed (4% speed-change for music is awfully much and can completely devastate groove & rhythm and tonal experience).Īs for the "remux phrase" itself, it's how you want to look at it. ![]() As stated earlier, it often is better to leave it as-is. Normally I let my player or tv take care of de-interlacing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |